climateprediction.net home page
Machines vs Processors

Machines vs Processors

Questions and Answers : Wish list : Machines vs Processors
Message board moderation

To post messages, you must log in.

AuthorMessage
old_user10

Send message
Joined: 5 Aug 04
Posts: 55
Credit: 87,392
RAC: 0
Message 3842 - Posted: 11 Sep 2004, 6:46:31 UTC

Just noticed the new \'number of PCs\' column in the team stats which is nice, but would it not be more useful to have total number of processors instead. A 2 processor machine is pretty much 2 machines in one box by my reckoning.
<a href="http://www.users.globalnet.co.uk/~sykesm/cpdn.html"><img src="http://www.users.globalnet.co.uk/~sykesm/gfx/sig.jpg"></a>
ID: 3842 · Report as offensive     Reply Quote
Profile Keck_Komputers
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 5 Aug 04
Posts: 426
Credit: 2,426,069
RAC: 0
Message 3860 - Posted: 11 Sep 2004, 9:23:49 UTC

The problem with that is what do hyperthreaded machines count as? It isn't really 2 processors even though BOINC will recognize it as 2.
<br>John Keck -- BOINCing since 2002/12/08 -- <a href="http://www.boinc.dk/index.php?page=user_statistics&amp;project=cpdn&amp;userid=191"><img border="0" height="80" src="http://191.cpdn.sig.boinc.dk?188"></a>
ID: 3860 · Report as offensive     Reply Quote
old_user1
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 5 Aug 04
Posts: 907
Credit: 299,864
RAC: 0
Message 3869 - Posted: 11 Sep 2004, 9:48:49 UTC

well sort of but then as jkeck notes what about HT's, and just because someone has 2 or 4 or 8 procs doesn't mean every single one is running CPDN etc. So I left it as just "one box!"

ID: 3869 · Report as offensive     Reply Quote
old_user10

Send message
Joined: 5 Aug 04
Posts: 55
Credit: 87,392
RAC: 0
Message 4844 - Posted: 30 Sep 2004, 10:29:12 UTC - in response to Message 3869.  

&gt; well sort of but then as jkeck notes what about HT's, and just because someone
&gt; has 2 or 4 or 8 procs doesn't mean every single one is running CPDN etc. So I
&gt; left it as just "one box!"
&gt;
Would it be easy to have a 'number of models' column instead then?
ID: 4844 · Report as offensive     Reply Quote
Profile Thyme Lawn
Volunteer moderator

Send message
Joined: 5 Aug 04
Posts: 1283
Credit: 15,824,334
RAC: 0
Message 4845 - Posted: 30 Sep 2004, 10:53:22 UTC - in response to Message 4844.  

&gt; Would it be easy to have a 'number of models' column instead then?

I'm not sure how accurate even that would be, Martin.

If you count the number of uncompleted models on the system you'll include ones that have been downloaded but haven't started running plus any that have errored out without reporting back to the servers (at least until the server decides they're not trickling any more and can be reallocated).

If you count the number of trickling models you'll again include errored out models and have a slight complication when a model completes. Do you assume another model has been started and use the same count (in which case lots of checks will be needed on the server) or do you reduce the count by one until the first trickle from the new model?

<a href="http://www.teampicard.net"><img src="http://www.teampicard.net/templates/fisubice/images/phpbb2_logo.jpg"></a><a href="http://climateapps2.oucs.ox.ac.uk/cpdnboinc/team_display.php?teamid=3">Join us here</a>
ID: 4845 · Report as offensive     Reply Quote

Questions and Answers : Wish list : Machines vs Processors

©2024 climateprediction.net